top of page

JOURNAL

Derealization, Depersonalization, and the Observing Self

Sometimes the self does not feel fully inside the body. The world remains visible, but it becomes distant, unreal, staged, or strangely unreachable. The voice may keep speaking. The face may keep performing. But another part of consciousness is watching from elsewhere — thinking, witnessing, hovering above the moment like a silent observer.

Enter as though the image is watching itself from outside the frame. These works move through mirrors, eyes, doubled figures, distant faces, altered rooms, and bodies that feel present but unreachable. The self has not vanished. It has divided its attention.

There are moments when reality does not disappear. It becomes unfamiliar.

Derealization and depersonalization live inside that strange distance. The world may still be there — the room, the voice, the body, the conversation, the face in the mirror — but something has shifted. Life begins to feel observed rather than inhabited. The self becomes both participant and witness, both body and watcher, both voice and listening mind.

In Megan Ashman’s work, this altered perception appears through mirrors, large eyes, closed eyes, watcher-figures, falling bodies, drowning figures, dreamlike women, divided compositions, and faces that seem present and absent at the same time. The image does not simply portray dissociation. It behaves like dissociation: layered, split, watchful, floating between inner and outer reality.

For Ashman, the observing self is not just a poetic device. It is part of lived experience. There are moments when the body continues speaking, responding, moving through ordinary life, while another part of consciousness watches from outside the moment. Not literally as fantasy, but psychologically — as a division of presence, a distance between the self that performs and the self that witnesses.

A journal fragment names the split plainly:

“I can be talking, but I am not the one talking. I am observing myself and thinking while I speak.”

That sentence is central to this journal because it names something many people never think to question. For years, Ashman did not realize that other people did not experience themselves this way. The observing self felt ordinary because it had always been there — a watcher hovering near the body, a mind thinking beside the voice, a consciousness slightly removed from the person everyone else could see.

This is where trauma enters the work without needing spectacle or explanation. Dissociation can become a survival architecture. When the body or mind cannot safely remain fully present, consciousness learns to divide, distance, observe, detach, float, or fragment. The self does not leave because it is weak. It leaves because something inside it is trying to protect the whole system.

That protective distance becomes visible in the paintings. A figure may fall while another watches. A face may stare from a mirror and feel unrecognizable. A woman may appear with closed eyes, not asleep exactly, but suspended in a dream-state. A large eye may dominate the composition like a psychic witness. The body may be present, but the awareness has moved somewhere else.

She stares in the mirror. This place is not real. The observer from above hears herself whisper: this face is not mine.

Derealization changes the world. Depersonalization changes the self. Together, they create an atmosphere where everything familiar becomes slightly displaced: the room feels unreal, the face feels foreign, the voice feels automatic, and the mind becomes a witness to its own existence.

Another journal fragment carries the mirror image:

“She stares in the mirror. This place is not real. The observer from above hears herself whisper: this face is not mine.”

That line belongs to the same symbolic territory as many of the paintings. Mirrors do not simply reflect identity. They challenge it. They ask who is looking, who is being seen, and whether the face belongs to the consciousness observing it. In this way, the mirror becomes less an object than a threshold between body and self.

Phantasmagorism gives this divided perception a visual language. Images appear through layers the way parts of consciousness appear through dissociation. A figure can be present and absent. A face can be both self and stranger. A hidden image can watch from beneath the surface. The painting becomes an altered state, not because it escapes reality, but because it reveals how unstable reality can feel from inside a divided mind.

The Gestalt effect matters here too. From one distance, the image may seem whole. From another, it fractures into symbols, bodies, eyes, shadows, rooms, and fragments. The viewer’s perception moves between unity and division, just as the dissociative self moves between participation and observation. The painting has not changed. The position of consciousness has.

Maybe this is why the observing self appears so powerfully in Ashman’s work. It is not only a symptom of distance. It is also a witness. It sees what another part of the self could not bear to feel directly. It remembers from above, from beside, from the edge of the room. It watches until the hidden material can begin to return.

The work does not turn dissociation into spectacle. It turns it into symbolic language: eyes, mirrors, falling bodies, dream-states, watchers, distant rooms, and selves that hover just beyond reach. It gives form to the strange truth of being both inside life and outside it — speaking, watching, remembering, and slowly returning.

bottom of page